3/8/2023 0 Comments Master slave dialectic pdfThis chapter situates Gilles Deleuze’s The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque in the context of its rejection of phenomenologically inspired readings of Leibniz. In the Conclusion, I examine Deleuze's famous, almost cliché, definition of ethics as not being unworthy of the event and, through the empty form of time, I connect it to Kant's formalistic ethics. The third step focuses on what Deleuze calls ‘the ethics of intensive quantities’. Like sufficient reason, others are ambiguous, at once lending themselves to what cancels differences, and opening the way towards difference and intensity. But then, third, we must understand Deleuze's ‘demoralisation of sufficient reason’, which necessarily passes through others. The second part of the essay will therefore concern ‘the moralisation of sufficient reason’. It is this ambiguity in sufficient reason that allows it to be taken advantage of, to be used by representation and good sense for a moral purpose. Sufficient reason is struck with an irreducible ambiguity. First, we determine what sufficient reason or grounding is, for Deleuze. But I argue that what is really at stake is a movement of demoralisation. There is no question that the stakes of the reversal of Platonism are ontological. But the essay's aim is to understand Deleuze's reversal of Platonism in his 1968 Difference and Repetition. This essay starts from a consideration of Deleuze's theory of time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |